Thoughts on Plagiarism

As you can imagine, teenagers often look for the best way to maximize results, while minimizing time and effort.  This is no surprise because it’s what we all do.  However, when it comes to academic integrity, the “easy way” can often get students in trouble.

This is not to say that students plagiarize maliciously, only that copy/paste is often too easy not to do.

In an attempt to cut back on plagiarism, many high schools have started using as a way of comparing student work to assignments submitted by other students and to sites across the web.  The truth is, is effective in reducing plagiarism, mostly because it makes students scared.  In my opinion, making students fearful every time they submit an assignment leaves a bitter taste in their mouths, which I think is harmful for inquiry-based learning in the long run.

Just to be clear, what I am talking about in this post is the type of plagiarism that most high school teachers deal with, namely copy/paste.  I am not talking about more serious issues of academic integrity like paying other people to do your work for you.

I think that the problem of plagiarism in high school stems from two bigger issues:

  1. We are not taking the time to teach students how to conduct research properly.
  2. Assignments that teachers give are often too simple to be called “research.”

In general, we need to be doing a better job to educate teenagers as to WHY referencing is so important.  Most importantly, it needs to be taught, not from a place of fear for getting caught, but from a place of character education.  It is important to be academically honest because it is the right thing to do!  In my experience, appealing to students’ sense of right and wrong is actually quite effective because everyone has been on the receiving end of “wrong” before, and knows what it feels like.

I also think that students fail to site their work, simply because it’s a lot of extra work to do it.  I remember being in university and being told that my APA formatting had to be perfect or I would lose marks.  But who can really remember if you’re supposed to put a comma after the date or a period, or whether or not the title should be underlined or italicized?  Even for someone like me, who wants to be academically honest, referencing properly is annoying.  The inconvenience of creating citations is one of the reasons why I like the web tools so much (easybib, bibme, Citation Maker, etc.)  Although these tools are not perfect, they make the process of creating references so much faster and and easier for students.

The second reason that students plagiarize is because they have been asked to do meaningless work.  The teachers who are teaching now did not grow up in the same type of world our current students are living it.  We grew up in a time of information scarcity; our students have an abundance of it (and maybe an overabundance!)  Finding the name of the Prime Minister and a list of his duties is now so ridiculously easy that the task becomes a joke.  Even looking for more complex information, such as the pros and cons of nuclear energy, may have been difficult at one time, but can easily be found these days with a simple Google search.  No wonder students copy/paste from the internet!

Teachers need to be redesigning their assignments to make them plagiarism proof.  One of the key ways of achieving this is to ensure that the method of output is not the same as the method of input.  That is to say, requiring that students transform their learning into a new format or medium.  For example, if students are researching the pros and cons of nuclear energy, don’t ask them to write a report (text in, text out); instead, ask them to put together a public service announcement, or write a song about it (text in, audio/video out).  Even more important though, is asking students questions that are not easily googlable.  If the answer can be found in one of the top sites in a Google search, then the question does not require any higher order thinking skills and should not be considered research to begin with!

Photo Credit: Nisha A

Edublog Award Nominations 2010

edublog awards

This is the first year that I have decided to weigh in on the nominations for the Edublog Awards.  If you are not familiar with the awards, they are designed to recognize the contributions and achievements of edubloggers, twitterers, podcasters, video makers, online communities, wiki hosts and other web based users of educational technology.  In general, it is a mechanism for honouring the amazing people in the online educational community.

For me personally, the Edublog Awards are one of the best ways I am able to expand my personal learning network.  One of the difficulties I have in making nominations is how valuable all of the people in my PLN are to me – it’s hard to nominate only one for each category.  The second difficulty I have is knowing who has been useful to me.  My blogroll contains over 60 blogs that I try to keep up with regularly and I follow over 400 people on Twitter.  It’s often hard to remember who has had the greatest influence on me overall.

So, without further ado … my 2010 Edublog Award Nominees are …

Best individual blog: dy/dan

Best new blog: MrK’s Professional Reflections

Best resource sharing blog: Free Technology for Teachers

Best school administrator blog: The Principal of Change

Best educational tech support blog: The Edublogger

Best educational use of video / visual: dy/dan

Best educational webinar series: learncentral

Best use of a PLN: Classroom 2.0

I am sorry that there are no descriptions for why I have nominated each blog.  Time is short.

I want to thank Edublogs for:

  1. Hosting my blog.  Their support has been so amazing to me as a newbie blogger.
  2. Creating the Edublog Awards for helping to encourage excellence in educational conversation.

Using a Voice Recorder for Answering Emails

This past weekend I was at a wedding when I received this email from a student:

Hey Mr. Whisen

Okay so for my presentation of the roller coasters i was researching the difference between clothoid loops and the circular loops that occurred in rollar coasters before.  I know that clothoid loops are more efficient but I don’t understand how I can use the formula to demonstrate this.

At this point in the day I am filling time between the ceremony and the reception.  I want to reply to the student but I know it will take me a long time to type out a detailed explanation on my BlackBerry.  I also know that I will do not want to wait until I get home (at 2:00 am) to respond to her.

In a flash, it occurs to me that my phone also has a voice recorder in it!  In no time, I record my detailed response to her question and email her back the audio file.  Altogether, this took less time than typing an answer and I was able to give a far more detailed response!

I love finding new ways to use technology.  Another tool to add to the toolkit!

By the way, if you’re dying to know my answer … have a listen.

If You’re Going to Give Them Garbage

This is a short post to share with you all a quote I just read for the first time today:

“Far less interesting to me than whether a student has learned what he was supposed to is the question, ‘Has the child been given something to do worth learning?'”


“If you’re giving them garbage to do … you may have to bribe them to do it.”

– Alfie Kohn

The video shown below does a great job of using The Office to embody what Alfie Kohn is talking about.

How many classrooms still operate like this?

This is a short post, so I wont comment any further.  Draw your own conclusions.